Here we find one of the main contradistinctions in Machiavelli’s thought: A state can either be ruled by a prince, or it can be organized as a republic. Although this view is contested, many scholars say, that the term “republic” in Machiavelli’s thought does not mean some kind of constitutional form of government. Instead, they say, that “republic” should be taken in it’s original meaning “res publica” (= common wealth). For Machiavelli, every state which is concerned with the common wealth of the people, instead of the particular desires of aristocrats or a prince, is a republic.