Or, YOWWYCH!

The hardest thing in life is wanting what you can’t have, because of money, location, issues, or more. Instead of finding something that you can have, you spend time pining over that one thing, missing out on everything else.

One of the easiest ways to feel strong, and to hide from the world, is the sunglasses/headphones combo. By covering your eyes and ears, it sends the world’s largest “don’t talk to me” signal, while keeping any issue far away.

No matter what the issue, unless you die, you’ll have another go at things. Even in love, taking a bow, then coming back later is always an option. Follow your heart.

Brown was accused of being the mastermind behind a robbery attempt. In the “plot,” an armored truck was to be stopped and robbed at gunpoint. In practice, the driver was killed.

While prosecutors could not obtain Brown’s phone records (which would be needed to directly link him to a crime), they used the phone records of other suspects. Brown received multiple calls from one suspect, but otherwise has not been proven to actually have known about the plot. The supposed NSA records would be needed to prove his innocence, as their content would theoretically show that his calls were unrelated.

Specifically, the Guardian leaks documents which suggested that, using the PATRIOT Act and FISA, the government had effectively created a record of every Verizon call, text, and message. The court order has been used to underscore the sheer scale and volume of intelligence gathering schemes that undermine the Constitution, such as PRISM.

View the full breakdown of this speech!

While the need to have some sort of intelligence gathering apparatus is very well defined, balancing this need with the Constitution in the post-Cold War period is not easy. With the extremes of no security and too much spying, the end results can often be abuses of power or failures to identify threats. The PATRIOT Act, in its original iteration, was supposedly designed to corral these potential abuses, forcing a court order and periodic Congressional approval for data gathering. Instead, the measure has been perverted to justify any effort, so long as a court order, done in secret, is attached.

Of course, plenty of critics feared at the time that the Patriot Act would lead to exactly these kinds of abuses. Here’s a handy 2003 roundup of the criticisms and lawsuits that the legislation had already attracted less than two years after passage.

The controversial act gives the Executive Branch certain powers to pursue “enemies” and perceived terror threats. These measures tread the line of legality, often stepping over it with secret court approval. While originally intended to allow small, rare intrusions into the law, the measure has now been used to justify PRISM, the capture of Verizon data, and more — all on U.S. citizens.

This, in more common terms, is called a “backdoor.” Destroying the active system, or even modifying it in a noticeable way, is not the goal of a malicious hacker. If that were to occur, the intrusion would be easily detected and closed. Instead, the goal is to allow easy repeat access, keeping a “door” into the system open, while remaining private.