The Black Panthers had been so much a part of that era, when black people, for the first time, told America they were proud of everything they were. The horrific truth of the party’s downfall was an open secret among black Oaklanders and party veterans, but most of them insisted on silence (and still do to this day)–something akin to not discussing the state of a relative who has gone to pot, or, sensing that death might occur any day, preparing to recall only the best.

The Black Panther Party was the closest thing this country had to a revolutionary party. If you’re interested in understanding power, white supremacy, or oppression in America, it’s not possible without understanding the experience of political groups like the BPP. The book’s power is from how obvious it is that Pearson’s conception of Newton and the Black Panther Party was challenged. He grapples with the good the Party did and the moral bankruptcy that eventually emerges. It’s painful to watch this revolutionary moment become so thoroughly rancid and corrupt, but incredibly important given its mythology on the Left and Right.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

In the book’s preface, she unambiguously points out

The United States had never in its history intervened to stop genocide and had in fact rarely even made a point of condemning it as it occurred.

The book is an exhaustive account of genocide and how it has been discussed within the American establishment and acted upon, if at all.

People have explained U.S. failures to respond to specific genocides by claiming that the United States didn’t know what was happening, that it knew but didn’t care, or that regardless of what it knew, there was nothing useful to be done. I have found that in fact U.S. policy makers knew a great deal about the crimes being perpetrated. Some Americans cared and fought for action, making considerable personal and professional sacrifices. And the United States did have countless opportunities to mitigate and prevent slaughter. But time and again, decent men and women chose to look away. We have all been bystanders to genocide. The crucial question is why.

http://www.amazon.com/Problem-Hell-America-Age-Genocide/dp/0465061516

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Great article by Howard Fineman in Newsweek which goes over how George Bush’s faith and world view intertwined, informed his presidency, staffed his administration, and ultimately drove many of his signature foreign policy moves.

There it is, encapsulated in prime time: the Bush campaign, presidency and world view. This is a president who often would rather preach than answer questions–or ask them. He leads and runs unapologetically on faith, dividing the world and the presidential campaign into two discrete spheres: one for patriots who believe in his policies and vision, and one for everyone else. Whether he can win re-election that way is unclear. The race is a tossup; the press conference didn’t appreciably move the polling needle. But if Karl Rove is the guru, the strategy is pure Martin Luther. “Here I stand,” Bush seems to declare. “I can do no other.”

http://www.newsweek.com/gospel-according-george-125363

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Manicheanism refers to an extant religion that ultimately viewed existence as a cosmic struggle between good and evil, between the spiritual and material. Today, its used to describe people who hold the view that actions are clearly either morally good or bad.

Winston Churchill constantly fell back to this vision, stemming from a Christian worldview that saw it necessary to defend Christian civilization from existential threats, specifically the Axis in World War II and the Soviet Union at the onset of the Cold War.

At the close of his 1940 “Their Finest Hour” speech, Winston insists

What General Weygand called the Battle of France is over. I expect that the Battle of Britain is about to begin. Upon this battle depends the survival of Christian civilization. Upon it depends our own British life, and the long continuity of our institutions and our Empire. The whole fury and might of the enemy must very soon be turned on us. Hitler knows that he will have to break us in this Island or lose the war. If we can stand up to him, all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science. Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, “This was their finest hour.”

The entirety of his 1946 “Iron Curtain” also insisted that there was a cosmic struggle between good and evil afoot. In it, he prevailed upon the audience to understand that “[f]rom Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the Continent” and that this iron curtain would set the stage for another struggle between the forces of good and the forces of evil.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

Not an expert in any of this, but it’s the stuff I’m obsessed with:

  • European history, 17th-20th century
  • Neuroscience (cognitive and neuroeconomics)
  • Classical liberalism/left wing libertarianism
  • Philosophy of mind, philosophy of language
  • American grand strategy and geopolitics (in the strain of Kissinger and Brzezinski)
  • International relations (specifically realism and constructivism)
  • Sub-Saharan African economic development
  • Western science fiction
  • Rants
  • American electoral history (19th and 20th centuries)
  • Great Society & New Deal
  • Cosmology (specifically galaxy formation/ evolution)
  • Psycholinguistics
  • more fun stuff

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Nevada polls are notoriously unreliable and there have been mismatches between exit polls and actual Latino vote–notably John Kerry in 2004.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

He was under pressure to show that he could appeal to minorities, largely because of the huge margin of support Clinton held over him with the black electorate.

Nevada has a large non-white population, but unlike most of Clinton’s “Southern firewall”, it’s Hispanic.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Just as it would have been presumptuous to say that Bernie Sanders' New Hampshire victory signaled the end of Clinton, it’s euphoric to crown Clinton once again the inevitable nominee.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.