What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

Between 1980 and 1987, Marvelous Marvin ruled the middleweight boxing class, defending his title 12 times and participating in some of the most classic boxing matches of all time.

Hagler grew up in Newark, New Jersey, hardened by the Newark riots before moving to Brockton, Massachusetts. He found success early as the AAU 165-pound national champion (1973) but had difficulty finding high profile opponents who were willing to dance with him in the ring. However, after 7 years as a pro, Hagler finally got his title shot, defeating Alan Minter in 3 rounds. This was after changing his legal name to “Marvelous”, due to the fact that announcers had neglected to give his nickname the respect it deserved.

The 1980’s were an exciting era in boxing, thanks in particular to The Four Horsemen of boxing, Hagler, Sugar Ray Leonard, Roberto Duran, and Thomas Hearns. Some of the greatest matches of all time saw Hagler squaring up against these three men. He fought a close battle with Duran in 1983, which marked the first time we had seen Hagler look less-than-unbeatable. In what would later become known as “The War”, Marvelous Marvin and Tommy “the Hitman” Hearns sacrificed their bodies for three rounds in an all out sprint to hit the canvas, with Hearns getting knocked out in the third after breaking his right hand in the first round. Finally, he fought Sugar Ray Leonard in 1987, the result of which is still hotly contested today. Sugar Ray managed to steal a victory with his novel ring strategy. Hugh McIlvanney said of the fight:

What Ray Leonard pulled off in his split decision over Hagler was an epic illusion. He had said beforehand that the way to beat Hagler was to give him a distorted picture. But this shrewdest of fighters knew it was even more important to distort the picture for the judges. His plan was to “steal” rounds with a few flashy and carefully timed flurries and to make the rest of each three-minute session as unproductive as possible for Hagler by circling briskly away from the latter’s persistent pursuit. When he made his sporadic attacking flourishes, he was happy to exaggerate hand speed at the expense of power, and neither he nor two of the scorers seemed bothered by the fact that many of the punches landed on the champion’s gloves and arms.

After losing to Leonard – and Leonard refusing a rematch – Marvelous retired and moved to Italy, where he became an action movie star.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

The point of these lines is to demonstrate the ignorance and hypocrisy that Mick sees in those around him.

Although the woman (“shorty”) Mick is referring to isn’t attracted to men who fraudulently represent themselves or their status, this same woman has no problem wearing fake hair (“weave”) if it makes her more attractive to men.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

With the so-called “kettlebell fad” in full swing, many have been wondering how the improvements in performance match up with the improvements seen from traditional weightlifting.

This is one of the first studies to investigate that question, and the answer they found was what many kettlebell trainers have claimed for the past decade: kettlebells are not a fad at all, but are effective at increasing strength and power.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

This shouldn’t come as much of a surprise…The weightlifting group lifted much heavier weights during this study. For example, the weightlifting group was lifting 80% of their 1RM – roughly 106kg – during back squats, while the kettlebell group was lifting only 16kg during goblet squats, which comes out to about 12% of their 1RM.

While the authors here used the same protocol for progressive overload, i.e. they didn’t increase the weight for either group, just the fact that the weightlifting group was lifting much more weight partly explains the discrepancies there. Again, the same conclusion mentioned in the second annotation was reinforced here: the most efficient way to load the body with weight is with a barbell.

What does this mean?

Kettlebell training certainly has a place in some programs, depending on the individual’s goals, training experience, and time commitment. However, if you are training for pure strength, traditional weightlifting is the only way to go!

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

As per the vertical jump increases from both groups (italics mine):

To our knowledge, this is the first study to document the effectiveness of kettlebell training in improving performance during a lower-body power movement…It is well known that weightlifting can increase vertical jump performance (3,4,8), but it appears that kettlebell training can be just as effective in improving jumping performance. This might be explained by the similar movements of powerful ankle, knee, and hip extension done as quickly as possible while performing various kettlebell exercises.

For back squat:

As with the vertical jump, this is the first study to show that kettlebell training has the ability to increase 1RM strength, despite the emphasis of kettlebell training on explosiveness and the speed of movement rather than strength development.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

The weightlifting group saw larger increases across the board, but:

Only the differences in strength were statistically significant…

So if we look at the table in the previous note, we see the pre- and post-test totals for the back squat maximum:

  • Weightlifting: before = 133.08; after = 151.15
  • Kettlebell training: before = 124.24; after = 129.82

The effect size was 18.7 kg and 5.58 kg for weightlifting and kettlebell training, respectively. Which comes out to 13.6% and 4.5% increases, respectively.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

The weightlifting group used a certified weightlifting bar and Olympic plates. More specifically, they performed the lifts with 80% of their individual one-repetition maximum.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

At the moment, there are very few studies that have looked at the performance enhancing effects of kettlebell training. One reason for this is the fact that fitness fads are constantly rising and falling, so physiologists can’t be bothered to test every single fad. However, considering the kettlebell’s history, it’s obviously more than just a fad.

As this article mentions in its introduction:

Coaches may have an interest in using kettlebells; if space is limited, there is a lack of funding for Olympic bars or weights, or to assist athletes who have never lifted weights in gaining a foundation in the fundamentals of similar movements relating to strength and power (squat, press, clean and jerk, snatch).

Thus, the point of this study isn’t to come to a conclusion on whether kettlebell or barbell training is better – which is highly individual – but to look at what kind of performance improvements can be expected if one chose to use kettlebells rather than barbells for some extended period.

For the most part, both of these techniques deserve a place in your routine, for different reasons.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

Just to be clear, the two sessions per week focused on the same movement and a corresponding sets/reps scheme. For example:

  • Week 1 = Kettlebell swings or high pull, for 3 sets of 6 reps.
  • Week 2 = Accelerated swings or power clean, for 4 sets of 4 reps.
  • Week 3 = Goblet squats or back squats, for 4 sets of 6 reps.

Etc..

As far as progressive overload, which is needed to see any improvements:

Progressive overload was achieved through a combination of increased volume and an emphasis on the technique and speed of movement.

This goes for both the weightlifting and kettlebell groups.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.