I’m with Obama on this one. It’s amazing to me that this is how people think about war. It strikes me as a way of thinking about war that would only occur to someone who has never been in one themselves. It is abstract and maybe a little juvenile.

Of course you do need a way to credibly deter bad actors. But one wonders whether that need, too, arises because of similarly abstract thinking on the bad actor’s part. (I.e., the only reason you have to draw “red lines” and follow up on them is because baddies are constantly crossing lines; and they’re crossing lines because they’re not thinking about the literal human toll of their actions, they’re thinking about the world as a fucking game of Risk or whatever.)

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

I wonder if the four voice recorders in this picture are for four different reporters, or if the one reporter was just mega nervous about losing the audio. That would be kinda cute.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Seems obviously important to have a hierarchy of prestige with extremely strict gatekeepers at the very top—both to motivate scientists, and to help readers find the most important results in a sea of research—but that seems completely orthogonal to the money.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

it is so crazy that such fees exist. listen to this sentence! it makes no sense!

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Literally where is all this money going? Is the publishing process that expensive? Seems like the major costs would be: (1) peer review, but “publishers don’t pay for the volunteer peer reviewers or editors”; (2) production; and (3) distribution. But the cost of #2 and #3 can be negligible thanks to the Internet! Academic publishers are effectively in the position of a small independent magazine that doesn’t have to pay its authors! Sweet deal

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

this kind of thing seems important. the more vivid the evidence is, and the tighter the causal chains, the better

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.