The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is self-described as being responsible for

the stability of the international monetary system—the system of exchange rates and international payments that enables countries (and their citizens) to transact with each other.

Essentially, it works as an organization that enforces rules established by the credit community between nation-states. Partly for this reason, the IMF programs have not substantially eradicated poverty in the Third World since loans are given to governments but paid for by citizens in nations without much in the way of capital, regardless of whether they approved the policy or not.

As is the case in Greece, the IMF will usually require a nation to engage in a “structural readjustment program” (SAP). These programs are meant to maximize profits by shifting government spending from public programs to private firms, namely by substantially cutting taxes, welfare programs, and regulation in a bid to help attract capital and spur economic activity.

However, in Greece as in most of the Third World, these programs won’t change much.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

There are a multitude of Fitbit trackers available but generally they are meant to collect as much information about a person’s daily routine. With that data, Fitbit attempts to help create a health profile that is more personal and responsive to day to day events or trends than traditional mediums such as a doctor’s profile of your health.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

The car serves as a metaphor for the way things are moving in his life right now.

Vince’s seat is laid back, things are comfortable for him right now so there’s no reason to adjust anything.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

The Top 10 program has allowed for enrollment to more or less match demographics of the state of Texas. Texas, as of the 2013 Cenus, has a 32% Hispanic population and a 12% Black population.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Widely known as the Top 10% Program , the program also has scholarships available for students in the top 10%.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Justice Kennedy’s position traces further back but serves as a good introduction to the arguments against higher education affirmative actions by American liberals.

Kennedy has held time and time again that

universities could take race into account in order to create diverse classes. But he argued that race should be “one modest factor among many others” — and that universities were instead treating it as “a predominant factor,” which was unconstitutional.

His position may turn out to be the one that defines the future of affirmative action in higher education–race used only as one of many factors only after race-neutral approaches are exhausted and found to be insufficient.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Most of the commentary around affirmative action focuses solely on its role in higher education but this is a diminution of the policy and its huge successes. Affirmative action was first introduced under President John F. Kennedy in 1961 when an executive order declared that federal contractors were required to

take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.

It was President Lyndon B Johnson who later expanded this to include sex as a category safe from discrimination and it is in this context that affirmative action provides the largest benefits.

The greatest beneficiaries to affirmative action are actually white women, whom like blacks “were once considered property — not allowed to own property themselves and not allowed to vote”.

Women have, through affirmative action policies, gained access to employment and education opportunities that would otherwise be absent without these federal protections against discrimination.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.