@ewokABdevito How about a “consensus approval” for annotations? If 5 editors/mods/regs co-sign and affirm that your annotation, needs no editing (as it explains everything being used and what the line is EXACTLY ABOUT) then from that point on that annotation should set the standard, for how that song is annotated. Genius annotations should be allowed on every song page, automatically. It would vastly improve annotation quality and work ethic.
@tech-genius Also, it would be great if I could have my tates all lined up BACK in chronological order. I shouldn’t have to be editor for the bug, NOT BE THERE. That makes editorship 10 times harder, for everyone else who has been de-editored.
@ScopeY, you know the RG Terms and Literary Devices Page? Why don’t we actually USE IT to our benefit and elaborate on what emcees are using as lyricists? Like, knowing Nas used “personification” for the entirety of “I Gave You Power”, changes the entire way that song has been annotated.
Those who know what they’re using, should be given some more consideration for being made editor, as it would inform everyone on that page, what has been misinterpreted. The best editors, imho should be as well-informed as well, in addition to removing errors, unnecessary info, irrelevant gifs/images, etc. and not ignorant or left in the dark.